Aishkodeshaudio.com currently has five of Rav Weinberger’s shiurim available for free. Please check them out here.
I listened to two them (Baal Shem Tov 1 and 2) today and they were great!!
Aishkodeshaudio.com currently has five of Rav Weinberger’s shiurim available for free. Please check them out here.
I listened to two them (Baal Shem Tov 1 and 2) today and they were great!!
Rav Naftali Amsterdam
A resolution to bring all of Jewry back to Torah was found in his satchel. When asked how he planned to carry out this resolution, he replied, “I have resolved to keep all the laws of the Shulchan Oruch strictly. In this way I will serve as a living Shulchan Oruch, and anyone who wants to keep the Torah will be able to see in me a living example of a complete Jew and learn from me how to return to the Torah.”
From Sparks of Mussar by R Chaim Ephraim Zaitchik
Rabbi Zvi Miller’s sefer on Shmiras Einayim, Guarding your Eyes, is available for downloading here.
I posted the following comment on Cross-Currents:
“I’ve always wondered why, if Novardhok mussar resulted in such a true Simchas HaChaim, didn’t it continue to spread after the Holocaust? I would have thought that after the war, Novardhok’s message of not giving up and carrying on would have been welcome.”
One reader took time to email me the following response:
Good question.
I am not a Novhardoker, nor a son or grandson of one (if you define it as someone who learned in a Yeshiva that was part of the Novhardok network) – that is to my knowledge. Although I had a an elter zeide who lived in the city.
I see that you ask one question in the second sentence of your comment, while the third sentence seems to be asking something a bit different.
Anyway, first to the second sentence question – Briefly, I would venture to say that although R. Shafran’s point is well-taken, it is lost on some, perhaps many/most people. Not everyone is a deep thinker like him, and some people only saw absorbed the part that, as he wrote “Novardhok had a reputation for a pietistic and morose – to some even morbid – philosophy.” I suspect that even some/many/maybe most students, their children, and kal vachomer outsiders, didn’t get beyond the part of Novhardok that ridiculed olam hazeh pre-occupation, etc., which ultimately can yield the simcha, when properly handled. R. Nekritz was a great man, not everyone made it that far, some just absorbed part one, and didn’t get to part two. I could elaborate more I guess.
I thank this person for taking time to give me a reply.
When I was young I enjoyed reading the Sunday Comics. “Family Circus”, was never my favorite thing to read (I was more into the Far Side) , the classic NOT ME Ghost always gave me chuckle. Mostly because I could totally see myself in a situation where it was obviously my fault that X had happened, I could envision myself saying, “Not me.” and deflecting blame to another party.
I realized Wednesday night, while driving for an hour, that Hashem has taught me a very difficult lesson in responsiblity. The times that I judge to quickly, find a reason to hate someone, or try to make myself feel better by talking badly about someone don’t go unnoticed. I’ve get it. I don’t like it, but I get it. It’s my fault. As I’ve been told and as I’ve read for years, “Each generation in which the Beit Hamikdash is not rebuilt is considered as if it was guilty of its destruction”. I hope to make the next Three Weeks very meaningful.
The unaffiliated Jewish woman attended three of the rabbi’s lectures in the 1950s, visibly intrigued by the ideas he put forth, about the historicity of the Jewish religious tradition. Then she abruptly stopped coming.
Another woman who had also attended the lecture series tracked her down and asked why she was no longer showing up. The first woman answered straightforwardly: “He was convincing me. If I continue to listen to this man, I will have to change my life.”
What a remarkably honest person. (I like to imagine that she came, in time, to pursue what she then fled.)
And what a remarkable man was the rabbi who delivered the lectures. He was Rabbi Yaakov Weinberg, of blessed memory, whose tenth yahrtzeit, or death-anniversary, will be marked on the fast day of Shiva Asar BiTammuz (July 9). He later became the Rosh Yeshiva, or Dean, of the Ner Israel Rabbinical College in Baltimore. He was my rebbe.
As an 18-year-old studying in the Baltimore yeshiva in 1972, I watched him from afar. His father-in-law, Rabbi Yaakov Yitzchok Ruderman, of blessed memory, was the Rosh Yeshiva then; Rabbi Weinberg headed the Kollel, or graduate student program, and also delivered general Talmudic lectures. The depth of his knowledge, the power of his critical analyses of both Talmudic and worldly topics, his eloquence and his knowledge of history and the sciences all impressed me deeply.
But what I came to realize was that his brilliance and erudition were mere tools with which he was gifted. His essence was his dedication to truth, to Torah and to his students – indeed, to all Jews – and his humility.
When I think back on the many times I telephoned Rabbi Weinberg from wherever I was living at the time to ask him a question about Jewish law or philosophy, or for his advice, I am struck by something I never gave much thought to at those times: He was always available. And, I have discovered over the years, not only to me. As I came to recognize all the others – among them greatly accomplished Torah scholars, congregational rabbis and community leaders today – who had also enjoyed a student-rebbe relationship with Rabbi Weinberg, I marveled. In my youthful self-centeredness, I had imagined him as my rebbe alone. Who knew?
And his ongoing interactions with his students somehow didn’t prevent him from travelling wherever his services were needed. A sought-after speaker and arbitrator for individuals and communities alike, he somehow found time and energy for it all.
More telling, he felt responsible to undertake it all. He (and, may she be well, his wife, Rebbetzin Chana Weinberg) gave so very much to others (as the Rebbetzin continues to do). That, I long ago concluded, is the defining characteristic of true Gedolim, literally “great ones” – the term reserved for the most knowledgeable and pious Torah leaders of each generation: selflessness.
How painfully ironic, I sometimes think, that small, spiteful minds try to portray Gedolim oppositely. Then again, as the weekly Torah-portion of Korach recently read in synagogue reminds us, no less a Godol than Moses – the “most humble of all men” – was also spoken of cynically by some in his day. Plus ça change…
It wasn’t just in his public life, in his service to students and communities that Rabbi Weinberg’s self-effacement was evident. It was in little things too.
In the early 1980s, he was asked to temporarily take the helm of a small yeshiva in Northern California that had fallen on hard times. Although not a young man, he agreed to leave his home and position in Baltimore and become interim dean.
My wife and I and our three daughters lived in the community; I taught in the yeshiva and served as principal of the local Jewish girls’ high school. And so I was fortunate to have ample opportunity to work with Rabbi Weinberg, and to witness much that I will always remember. One small episode, though, remains particularly poignant.
Rabbi Weinberg was housed in a bedroom of a rented house. In the house’s other bedroom lived the yeshiva’s cooks – a middle-aged couple, recently immigrated from the Soviet Union.
Though Northern California has a wonderful climate, its winters can be a bit chilly, and the house’s heating system was not working. The yeshiva administrator made sure that extra blankets were supplied to the house’s residents, and an electric heater was procured for Rabbi Weinberg (the cooks, it was figured, had been toughened by a truly cold clime).
After a week or two of cold, rainy weather, it was evident that Rabbi Weinberg had caught a bad cold. Suspecting that perhaps the electric heater was not working, someone went to his room to check it. It wasn’t there.
Where it was, it turned out, was in the cooks’ room. Confronted with the discovery, Rabbi Weinberg sheepishly admitted to having relocated the heater. “I thought they would be cold,” was all he said.
Another heater was bought. And a lesson, once again, learned, about the essence of a Godol.
A thought: This post was titled an “Amazing story…”, but what is really amazing is that there a probably hundreds of stories similar to this one that people don’t know about Gedolim being sensitive to ordinary people. That’s true Gadlus HaAdom. -Neil
Tonight I realized that I have had over 60,000 visitors to this blog. For anyone who has stopped by over the past 3 years+, thank you for taking time to read my posts.
Most agree that it’s a good idea. There are plenty of people we meet, however, that we just don’t like. That’s OK. The mitzvah is to love them as Jews, not like them as people. Recently I experienced true Ahavas Yisrael from almost complete strangers. They helped me because it was a mitzvah, looking beyond my background or my hashkafa.
Real Ahavas Yisrael, not the kind that end up as a short story in a gloss weekly Jewish magazine or as a chapter in children’s Gadolim biography. Real Ahavas Yisrael that wakes you up that the cup of coffee that you psychologically know you need in order to function. Real Ahavas Yisrael, I’m talking about the kind that reminds you that we have to help others because Hashem is constantly helping us. Real Ahavas Yisrael, the kind you daven that your kids will practice when they become older.
Originally I was going to fill the post with several quotes on the importance of loving our fellow Jews from the likes of the Rambam, Rav Hirsch, and the Chofetz Chaim. I decided against this. Often in life we tend to meet people and try to figure out “what their angle” is. It seems that society has programmed us, well me, to think that most people I encounter have a hidden agenda. An act of kindness, a true Chessed, has an agenda as well, the most pure agenda, the will of Hashem. I am humbled that my creator has allowed me to meet a few people in my life that remind me of the kind of Jew I want to be.
A friend of mine alerted me to this letter that was recently published in Where What When in Baltimore:
To The Editor,
I would like to address the ongoing problem of teenages going astray in our community. The question is where are the teenagers supposed to “hang out”? Some families in our community think they have the answer, which is to open their homes as the “cool” place for teenagers to hang out. These families do not always have teen-aged children themselves but permit actvities in their home that the teens’ own parents parents would not allow. Why would their home be the ideal place for teens to be? Perhaps they have a big television, a Wii for gaming, and other home entertainments that might not be at the teen’s home. Is that really the only solution we can provide?
What about Shabbos afternoons? Once again, there are families that think they can provide the perfect opportunity for teens to be supervised in a “kosher” environment. My question is, is this really in the best interest of our teenagers?
The shuls in our community have activities for yough children, such as Bnos and Pirchei, but nothing for our teenagers. Why can’t we offer our teens organized activities? There are so many opportunities available: like visiting nursing homes as a group, learning programs, games, and other organized activities geared for teens.
It is time for the rabbis and community organizers to take action to protect our teens and direct them to use their time in a productive and true Torah way.
Sincerely,
ANONYMOUS
I’ve been sitting on this post for a few weeks. I wrote a letter to the editor. What follows is the basically what I sent in.
I realized that that the author is trying to address two issues:
1) Kids hanging out in private homes
2) Lack of organized Shabbos activites for teens
Regarding the first issue, what’s really so wrong with teenagers “hanging out” in a private home with parents supervising? I know, as a parent, I would much rather have my children spending time at someone’s home instead of sneaking around with me knowing under adult supervision. If a family doesn’t chose to have a television in their home and they don’t want their child “hanging out” with kids watching television, then tell you child “No”. I understand the Yetzer Hara to condemn another family for making a “cool place to hang out” must be incredibly stronger than the Yetzer Tov to actually be a parent that is involved and has a relationship with their on child. A relationship that allows a parent to say “No. I don’t want you watching television or playing Wii”, has to be based on true respect and honesty between parent and child. A relationship like that takes time and hard work. Most of us can’t even find time check email mail, these days , let alone attempt to forge a relationship with our children.
However, would you rather have your teenager hanging out with other teens unsupervised behind your back? Trust me, there are plenty of nice “frum” boys and girls who do things secretly that would make their mothers flip their sheitels. I think it’s great that someone is opening their home to teenagers in a supervised way. I take my kids to the “Shabbos park” and I notice groups of teenage boys hanging out without girls around. I also see teenage girls chilling out without any boys around. I also, every so often, see a mixed group. If the teenagers are not at the park then they must be someplace else and doing something else.
Now, the second issue is something that seems like common sense. Why not have organized programming available to teens is a community? I think if NCSY, Bnai Akiva, or a local Agudath Israel or a community Kollel were to set up options like the letter writer suggested it would be awesome. Of course, then we get into the issue of should the program be separate-gender. I would suggest there be various tracks, so children and parents can choose.
My oldest uber-child is only 9 years old. I’m not sure if a co-ed program would interest him when he’s a teenager. I do know that unsupervised hanging-out isn’t the best option. I spent plenty of years (pre-observance and after I became observant, as well) hanging out at homes when parents were not around. I will only say that we hung out at these homes, dafka, because parents were not around. If parents take the initiative to open their homes, the better off those teens are.